Later in 2018, Amazon added lifecycle management (LM) policies to EFS. For infrequently accessed objects, the benefits of the lower storage cost exceed the downside of reduced performance. With it, data stored in the IA storage class costs less per GB than Standard, has less available data throughput, is accessed with a higher latency, and incurs a per-GB retrieval fee. This feature was added in 2018 with the introduction of the Infrequent Access (IA) storage class. There still, however, was no price differentiation for frequently vs. One Zone cut prices by about half, providing a good option for users willing to sacrifice data redundancy. They’ve introduced several refinements that make EFS more flexible and affordable. It’s worth noting that prices have come down significantly since Amazon launched EFS in 2016. Optimizing EFS costs: Amazon keeps making it easier to save That’s a significant difference that can add up quickly. Using us-east-1 as a reference, S3 Standard costs $0.023 per GB / month, whereas EFS in the same region runs $0.30 per GB per month (for the first TB). So why wouldn’t you use EFS? Like other cloud storage options, EFS requires balancing convenience with cost. S3 Intelligent-Tiering, on the other hand, is a good choice for object-based storage that requires high durability, unlimited scalability, and low-cost infrequent access. EFS excels for workloads that require high throughput, low latency, and a file-based data model. This makes development on EFS very straightforward, since there is no operational difference between a local and EFS-mounted file system. The major advantage of EFS is that it can be used like any other file system. It’s designed to be attached to an EC2 instance, or to a Lambda function, and is treated as a standard file system storage device. Unlike S3 Intelligent-Tiering, EFS works at the file system level. Amazon EFS: The go-to for high availability storageĪmazon Elastic File System (EFS) is a scalable file storage service. It’s similar to S3 Intelligent-Tiering, and it’s a great way to optimize and reduce AWS costs. What ChatGPT didn’t mention, however, is that it can be tricky to balance EFS convenience and cost.įortunately, by using lifecycle management policies to take advantage of the Infrequent Access storage classes of EFS, you can achieve much better per-GB average rates. Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) is indeed scalable, fast, and designed to work seamlessly with EC2. ChatGPT is not wrong (although its limerick-writing skills could use a bit of work).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |